How I knew the Trade War selloff would bounce

Free After-Hours Analysis:

Tuesday morning the S&P500 tumbled at the open, extending Monday’s selloff. Trump’s trade war returned to the headlines as proposed tariffs were set to start May 1st. In the closing hours of April 30th, the Trump administration relented and further postponed the start of tariffs for our allies to allow for more negotiations. Unfortunately those concessions didn’t calm the market’s nerves and we tumbled back near 2,600 support in midday trade. But just when things looked their most hopeless, the market found a bottom and rebounded into the green by the close. What happened???

Loyal readers of this blog know we don’t get worked up over recycled headlines. That’s because most owners who feared those headlines sold them the first time it came out and those sellers were quickly replaced by confident dip buyers willing to rush in and hold those risks. That turnover in ownership is what “prices in” the news. Once all the people who are afraid of a headline bailout, there is no one left to sell the next reoccurrence of those headlines. When no one sells the news, it stops mattering. And that is what happened here.

A couple of months ago Trump’s trade war sent a chill through the markets. But now it is more of a shiver. And soon it will barely raise goose bumps. Those of us that recognize this pricing-in phenomena profit from these dips. Were these headlines new and unexpected? No. Where they more of the same? Yes. That told us to expect a smaller dip than last time and gives us a good gauge of when to buy the dip. We’ve been living with these headlines for a while, so that meant the dip won’t go very far and we could jump in early. And that is exactly what I did. I hope some of you were able to do the same.

The opposite is true when confronted with new, unexpected, and especially dire headlines. During periods like that, we stay away from the market for several days because it takes time for the market to come to terms with its new reality. But that wasn’t the case today and why prices rebounded so quickly.

As I’ve been saying since February’s plunge, we transitioned into a trading range and the market was going to consolidate last year’s gains. In theory trading ranges should be really easy to trade, all we have to do is buy when we get to the lower end and sell when we get to the upper end. It is actually that easy if that is what we did what we were supposed to do. Unfortunately most people get caught up in their bullish or bearish bias and that prevents them from seeing each of these range bound moves for what they are, an unsustainable move to the boundary of the range that will soon fizzle and reverse.

Instead of confidently buying the dip and selling the rally, most traders convince themselves that each mover lower is the start of the next crash and the following rebound is the start of the next breakout. People get way too emotional as we approach the edges of the trading range and overreact to what is really just a normal gyration. Buying weakness and selling strength can be really profitable for those of us that do it right. Unfortunately the crowd is constantly giving away money buying strength (high) and selling weakness (low). If most people lose money in the market, shouldn’t we be doing the exact opposite?

Keep doing what has been working. Right now that is buying weakness and selling strength.

If you found this post useful, return the favor by sharing it on Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook!

Jani

What’s a good trade worth to you?
How about avoiding a loss?
For less than $1/day, have analysis like this delivered to your inbox every day during market hours.